Friday, February 26, 2010

Rahul Bose-an actor turned activist

An actor turned activist ( influenced by Paash )

An interaction with an actor turned activist

Gurpreet Singh writes from Vancouver

IT was the Hindu Muslim riots of 1992 that turned Rahul Bose, an actor of the parallel Indian cinema into an activist. Currently on tour in Canada with a green message, he remembers how those riots in the Indian city of Mumbai had changed his outlook towards life and politics. However, the anti Muslim pogrom of Gujarat ten years later became a turning point in 2002. The Hindu right wing BJP government of Gujarat is blamed for the targeted killings of the Muslims by the Hindu extremists in connivance with the police.

Bose admits that he was scared to help anyone in 1992, but the villainy in Gujarat changed him completely. “I am not even scared of calling Mumbai, Bombay’’, he said in a private and informal chat at a party hosted by the Progressive Intercultural Community Services (PICS) in Surrey in reference to the threats made out by the Hindu fanatics to anyone who call the city by its old name. A film director had recently apologized to the Mumbai Nav Nirman Sena for doing so. “He should have gone to the police’’.

Bose is here at the joint invitation of the PICS and the Climate Change Action Network.

He has come with a message to the influential South Asian voters to press the politicians in the swing ridings for some action on climate change. He also reminds them that India is struggling hard to eradicate poverty and unemployment. “The developed countries like Canada which still remain big polluters compared to the developing countries like mine have no moral authority to press them to cut emissions’’, he told a gathering at the PICS’ Senior Center.

Apart from being an environmentalist, he is one of the prominent humanist and secular voices from the Bollywood. However, he prefers to be identified more with the alternative cinema than the mainstream Indian film industry. He has been writing for the Communalism Combat, a magazine of the peace activists who had helped the victims of the Gujarat massacre. “The terrorism should be treated alike as terrorism in the name of the Hindu religion is no different from Jihad’’, he said in a radio interview. In fact, the film Shaurya in which he played a young army officer posted in Kashmir touches an unconventional subject of the Indian army being infiltrated by the radical Hindu officers who kill Muslims in the name of war against terrorism. Although he believes that the Indian army is secular and can’t be blamed for a few bad apples, yet he is concerned with the violation of human rights in Kashmir. “If anyone raises that question he is branded anti national’’, he said at the party during a dinning table chat over range of issues. He believes in solving the problem of terrorism through dialogue and peace initiatives instead of resorting to tough laws and police repression. “The naxalites are fighting for the basics. There are strong socio economic reasons behind their violent actions. Even Rahul Gandhi (the son of the ruling All India Congress Committee President Sonia Gandhi) acknowledges this. Anyone else suggesting that would have been killed’’. He disclosed to me that he was influenced by Paash, a progressive Punjabi poet who was associated with the ultra leftist Naxalite movement. Paash was assassinated by the Sikh extremists.

He does not forget reminding youngsters to vote. An inedible ink mark on his left index finger suggested that he voted before coming to Canada. The assembly elections were held in three provinces, including Maharasthra where he voted on October 13. He was at the party when the counting of the votes began. “Some students question why should we vote? I tell them why not when the Hindu right wing parties try to control your lives by telling you not to wear jeans or oppose the Valentine’s Day’’.

http://www.southasiapost.org/2009/20091031/canada.htm

[Via http://paash.wordpress.com]

Bring It On

A Bollywood filmmaker has issued a lucrative challenge to horror movie fans: a $10,000 reward for anyone who can watch his latest supernatural thriller, alone, in a cinema until the closing credits. Ram Gopal Varma’s “Phoonk 2,” a sequel to his 2008 film of the same name, is about an evil spirit that traumatizes a family.

“Anyone who says the movie cannot scare him is going to be put in a theater by himself,” Varma told reporters in Mumbai at an event to promote the movie. Varma said the film fan who steps up to the challenge will be wired up to a heart monitoring machine as well as a camera that ensures they keep their eyes open during the whole movie. Readings from the machines will be shown live on a screen outside the cinema, Varma said, and if the contestant succeeds, they will win 500,000 rupees (approximately $10,850)…

[Via http://clouise91.wordpress.com]

Monday, February 22, 2010

South Asian Showdown 2010 [the evidence]

South Asian Showdown 2010

Originally uploaded by nursenicole329

i’ve uploaded photos as well as a few short video clips -  enjoy!

what an amazing night. high-energy dancing, vibrant, beautiful costumes and absolutely fantastic music – what more could you ask for?

[Via http://littlesisterladybug.wordpress.com]

Friday, February 12, 2010

Movie Review: My Name Is Khan (2010)

2 Stars (out of 4)

The message of My Name Is Khan is a laudable one: good and bad people are identifiable by their actions, not by characteristics like race or religion. But a laudable message can’t excuse the fact that My Name Is Khan just doesn’t work.

MNIK’s protagonist is Rizvan Khan (Shahrukh Khan), an Indian Muslim with Asperger syndrome. Asperger’s is an autism spectrum disorder usually characterized by physical awkwardness and trouble forming emotional connections with other people. As a child,  Rizvan’s special needs demand almost constant attention from his mother, alienating his younger brother, Zakir.

As an adult, Rizvan is forced to move to San Francisco to live with Zakir (Jimmy Shergill) after their mother dies. Zakir makes Rizvan work as a traveling cosmetics salesman, an odd assignment for a guy who doesn’t make eye contact and who’s frightened by loud noises and the color yellow. Rizvan is capable of navigating San Francisco, but he’s better at following instructions than he is at improvising.

Rizvan develops a crush on Mandira (Kajol), a divorced hairdresser with a young son named Sameer. Rizvan eventually wins over Mandira with his persistence, and they marry. They live happily for several years until the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Tragedy strikes the family, and Mandira — a Hindu — tells Rizvan that she regrets marrying a Muslim man. She tells him to go away until he can convince the President of The United States that he’s not a terrorist just because his last name is Khan. Rizvan takes Mandira’s command literally and sets off to find the president.

For a number of reasons, MNIK just doesn’t work. American filmgoers won’t be able to ignore the things the movie gets wrong about America. While the non-Indian American actors in the movie are actually pretty good (most Hindi films hire terrible American actors), characters don’t speak in proper colloquialisms. Phrases like “piss off” and “bloody Paki” are British insults, not American insults.

The movie shows footage of a turban-wearing Sikh man targeted by thugs who mistake him for an Arab, establishing correctly that many Americans can’t differentiate between people of Indian, Middle Eastern and northern African origin. But the movie later attributes a beating to the fact that the character’s last name is Khan, a Muslim surname. This defies the movie’s own conclusions about American worldliness. Most Americans don’t associate the name Khan with Islam, they associate it with Star Trek.

MNIK’s weakest element is the romance between Rizvan and Mandira. The movie spends a long time establishing that Rizvan, despite certain competencies, isn’t able to live independently. He’s not able to be a full partner to Mandira, and she often treats him the same as she does her son. It’s hard to understand why she agreed to marry him.

But, given that they are married, it’s incomprehensible that Mandira would be so cruel as to send Rizvan on a fool’s errand by himself. That she doesn’t feel bad about it makes her heartless, and the excuses the film offers on her behalf don’t hold water.

The movie tries to explain how Rizvan is able to execute a cross-country trek that spans years, but I don’t buy it. The movie doesn’t make it clear exactly how long Rizvan’s journey takes, but it would be almost impossible for anyone to execute, let alone someone coping with Asperger’s.

My Name Is Khan is watchable, but it ultimately fails by overreaching. It might have worked as a story about a couple coping with the challenges of one partner’s Asperger syndrome. It might have worked as a story about a man who wants to show America that not all Muslims are terrorists. But compressing both stories into one movie is an impossible task, even for superstars like SRK and Kajol.

*AMC theaters list the movie’s runtime as 2 hrs. 25 min. It’s closer to 2 hrs. 35 min. The showing I attended also had 10 min. of previews.

[Via http://accessbollywood.wordpress.com]

My Name is Khan - How Long They Will Attack!!

My Name is Khan is that a crime?

My Name is Khan has finally hit the theaters across India except Mumbai, because Mumbai is govern and controlled by none other than the hoodlums – Shiv Sena and MNS (Maharashtra Navnirman Sena) – who ransacked theaters and tore posters across Mumbai.

When things like this are happening around, no one would be willing to face the ire of those who are very much safe because State and Central government finds no answer to it – they think they will use it in the next elections– and they carry on rioting from years.

What was wrong if Shah Rukh Khan freely voiced the agony of millions cricket lovers that Pakistani players should have been treated in a better way – even if they were not be taken in the IPL3 (Indian Premier League) – because sports are above politics. Politics many a times divide people while sports try to fill the gorge between them.

The simple motto behind SRK’s comment would have been let sports alone, with IPL’s response not to choose the Pakistani players, the players must have felt ashamed. If they were not to be bought by the franchisees, they shouldn’t be put to auction rather been told meticulously that they cannot take part because of the security reasons.

A comment that caught the eyes of Shiv Sena who are least bothered about the image of India rather they are more concerned about their own political mileage. Patriotism and national interest is their least concern and it only shows in the words but it never came into action. If they had they would never ever tried to sabotage the constitutional rights of the people of India.

If they – Sena- have the freedom of expression – through Sena’s mouthpiece Saamna – why can’t an ordinary Indian – SRK may not be ordinary – use the same to say what he feels? Read Saamna editorials and you will find nothing about development but everything will be subjected to political, regional and religious division over which they have constructed Maatoshree.

How long an artist – MF Hussain – an actor Shah Rukh Khan and a director Karan Johar would forcibly apologize – to save their neck or else has to run away from India?

Not easy to comment over the film success or failure but it has lead to arguments and discussions that how long the politics of division, rioting and forcibly seizing a city or a state would continue?

[Via http://bollywoodcorner.wordpress.com]

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Famous Singer C Ashwath passed away| C Ashwath Death News Video | ABOUT Singer C Ashwath

Singer C Ashwath famous pass away this morning. Was suffering from liver and kidney failure, and was admitted to ICU at Columbia Asia Hospital. He was a music composer and interpreter of Indian Bhavageete and Janapada Geete the doctor language.The kannada has said that he was responding well to treatment would be back to normal condition. Perhaps the only Music Director in Karnataka.

Biography

C. Ashwath Kannada: December 29, 1939 – December 29, 2009 was an Indian music composer and interpreter of poetry and songs Janapada expressive Bhavageete folk Geete in the language kannada. Also served as singer and has sung many of his own compositions. He was credited with Bhavageete singing songs and Janapada and Geete make sure they reach the common man. Died on December 29, 2009 on his birthday 71. He suffered from liver and kidney failure.

C. Aswath a household name in Karnataka. It is perhaps the only Music Director in Karnataka has carved on its own expert in each of the three areas of music as an element of expression demand: Theater, Film and Sugam Sangeetha.

He was born on December 29, 1939. He graduated in Science from Bangalore University and later worked in India for 27 years Telephone Industries before retiring in 1992 as Executive Engineer. He began his musical career as a pupil Devagiri Shankararao Joshi in Hindustani Music.

He turned 70 on the 29th Decebmer 2009. His friends and well wishers are planning to celebrate his 70th birthday in a spacial way. A function being held at Ravindra Kala Kshetra, Bangalore and Swamiji of Suttur and Virendra Hegde was to facilitate him on the occasion tonight. After this, it was expected to sing popular songs. Because it can be luck, singer / songwriter C Ashwath finally breathe on his birthday. His death leftKannada music lovers in the pool of tears.

As both singer and composer, was extremely popular among Kannadigas in Karnataka and all over the world. His concert in Bangalore in 2005 and attended by a crowd of nearly 100,000 people. It has also given concerts outside India, as in Melbourne for Melanudikannada sangha and other slightly in the UK.

He has composed music for few films too. Some of his notable compositions include the composition of music for Mysooru Mallige – the classic work of noted poet KS Narasimhaswamy and compositions ofKannada saint Santa Shishunala Sharifa works. He has also composed music for a very popular film ‘Matadaana’ along with other popular music director V. Manohar.

[Via http://virginnews.wordpress.com]

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Quick Picks for the 81st Oscars, or, Terrible Awards Guesses Part Deux

It’s that magical time of the year, when trophies are handed out from this society and that, but we’re finally onto the gold standard, the little man that means the most: the Oscars. And this year is no exception, with some sweeping steps in the dimensions of cinema vying with each other for Academy recognition. Let’s take a look at the nominees for the awards I actually care about, and let’s make some predictions:

  • In contention for Best Picture we have:

    1. An Education, whose major theme appears to be “Blockbusting;”
    2. A Serious Man, which like all Coen Brothers movies is defies classification in a single sentence, but if I had to try, I’d say it’s about the most interesting nebbish you’ve ever met;
    3. Avatar, about the White Man’s Burden as it exists in the future on other planets;
    4. The Blind Side, about the same,  this time in modern middle-class America;
    5. District 9, which is about apartheid, but with extra-terrestrials;
    6. The Hurt Locker, about a soldier who loves dismantling bombs more than his own family;
    7. Inglourious Basterds, which is a revisionist, nazi-killing, romp that questions if terrorism is ever justified;
    8. Precious,which sounds to be about the most schadenfreude-fueled, feel good movie of the year (and we have The Blind Side on the list);
    9. Up is about two adorable little people, one old and one young, who learn to love each other, but the DVD released without subtitles, so screw their feel-good antics; and lastly;
    10. Up in the Air is a tale of a man with no time for life on the ground, which seems to have a happy ending without the middle of the film making me want to kill myself.

    These are some seriously hard choices and there doesn’t appear to be a definitive winner looking over the list. Last time James Cameron directed a movie (1997) it won Best Picture (Titanic), but by putting another CGI affair on the list (Up) they’re practically slapping the new technology Cameron created over the past decade-and-change in the face. The past three years the Best Picture award went to Slumdog Millionaire, No Country for Old Men, and The Departed, so no discernible pattern except for firsts (in reverse order: first Scorcese win, first Coen Brothers’ directorial win, first Bollywood win), so here are the possibilities: if either Avatar or District 9 win, it’ll make for the first sci-fi Best Picture win, if Up wins it’ll be the first Animated Best Picture win, and there’s always of course a chance to go the Scorcese route and give both Picture and Director to Tarantino, giving him his first Oscar in those two categories. That last scenario’s the one I’m rooting for, personally, but there’s truly too much competition (what with the nominees expanded to ten for crying out loud) to call it.

  • Since that first category’s the big one, and the others are just gravy filling out the night, let’s run through the next few briskly, shall we? For Best Actor they’ve nominated:
    1. Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart
    2. George Clooney, Up in the Air
    3. Colin Firth, A Single Man
    4. Morgan Freeman, Invictus
    5. Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker

    The last three years saw the award going to Sean Penn (Milk), Daniel Day Lewis (There Will Be Blood), and Forest Whitaker (The Last King of Scotland), so the trend tends to be drifting toward “based on a true story,” hence a guess from me for Morgan Freeman for the role of Nelson Mandela if it went to trend. However, I’ve heard phenomenal things about Bridges’ performance so I think the Academy may break from the mold and give it to the country singer with a heart of gold.

  • For Best Actress we’ve got these bevvies to choose from:

    1. Sandra Bullock, for The Blind Side
    2. Helen Mirren, The Last Station
    3. Carey Mulligan, An Education
    4. Gabourey Sidibe, Precious
    5. Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia

    Kate Winslet (The Reader), Marion Cotillard (La Vie en Rose), and Helen Mirren(The Queen) took the prize in the three years previous, so this tells us nothing except that the Academy likes English and French chicks. I’m calling it for Helen Mirren in that the award’s been given to actresses in (semi-)biopic films for the past four years (year before that it went to Reese Witherspoon for Walk the Line).

  • Best Director we’ve got these greats:
    1. Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker
    2. James Cameron, Avatar
    3. Lee Daniels, Precious
    4. Jason Reitman, Up in the Air
    5. Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds

    Because in the past three years Best Director has also won Best Picture [Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire), Coen Brothers (No Country for Old Men) and Martin Scorcese (The Departed)], I’m calling it wistfully for Tarantino.

  • For Best Original Screenplay, there’s these gems:
    1. Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker
    2. Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman, The Messenger
    3. Joel Coen & Ethan Coen, A Serious Man
    4. Pete Docter, Bob Peterson & Tom McCarthy, Up
    5. Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds

    I’m sorry, it doesn’t get any more original in Hollywood than a guy’s life getting severely screwed up by a dybbuk, so the award, in my head, goes to those nice Coen boychicks.

  • Best Adapted Screenplay distinguishes these films:
    1. Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci & Tony Roche, In the Loop
    2. Neill Blomkamp & Terri Tatchell, District 9
    3. Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious
    4. Nick Hornby, An Education
    5. Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air



    Oddly, the past three years, Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay went to the same films. Since that’s not an option this year (unless they all go to Up In the Air) I’d give it to District 9, particularly considering that the adaptation from the original short film by the same writers came way shy budget-wise from a usual blockbuster film, and because sci-fi’s never taken this award before and it’s about time that changed.

  • Best Animated Film I hope goes to:
    1. Coraline
    2. Fantastic Mr. Fox
    3. The Princess and the Frog
    4. The Secret of Kells
    5. Up

    Because Neil Gaiman deserves pretty much any award you’ve got to offer.

  • Best Cinematography I presume will go to:

    1. Avatar
    2. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    3. The Hurt Locker
    4. Inglourious Basterds
    5. The White Ribbon

    This is due, primarily, to the fact that the film is supposedly unsurpassed cinematically in awe and beauty, and required new technologies to get there. Sure, I’ll give that to Cameron, but someone pop that over-inflated ego before it kills us all.

  • Best Make-up, Best Visual Effects, Best Sound-Mixing, and Best Sound Editing I usually couldn’t give a rat’s patooty about, but there’s one contender that’s in these categories that isn’t anywhere else, which really deserves to be, and that’s Star Trek. J.J. Abrams’ masterpiece ought to have had The White Ribbon’s spot on Best Cinematography and/or The Messenger’s spot on Best Original Screenplay and/or Eric Bana should have had Woody Harrelson’s spot for Best Supporting Actor. Whatever, we’ll let it slide, Academy, so long as Star Trek takes the gold in all these categories. It’s not even worth mentioning the other candidates, but here’s the rundown in case you were wondering.

Be sure to leave your own picks in the comments section, and tune in to ABC on Sunday March 7th, 2010 (8PM Eastern/5Pm Pacific) for the actual results.

Best Director

Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker

James Cameron, Avatar

Lee Daniels, Precious

Jason Reitman, Up in the Air

Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds

[Via http://worldsasmyth.wordpress.com]

Monday, February 1, 2010

main our mrs. Khanna

this time the review is about a movie starring salman khan. Another khan from bollywood cinema. The movie was produced by his brother sohail khan who also played in this movie.

The story is about Raina (played by kareena kapoor), an orphan who need to continued her life outside the orphanage.. Who is suddenly after her pray to asked a sign from her god, bumped in to samir khanna (salman khan).

And the story goes, raina with no last name become raina khanna. But the story begin when samir decided to sent raina back to india,while he goes to singapore.

Rania,decided not to go back to india,instead she stayed in australia and work in the airport where samir leave her before. And there,she become a friend with akash (sohail), who was in love with her.. He always calls raina as mrs. Khanna

At the end, we will know why he kept calls raina as mrs.khanna.. Coz such a coincidence that akash is akash khanna hahaha

In my opinion, the story is so so.. But the songs is not bad.. I like the song don’t say alvida, hapening and mrs. Khanna.. Although the music seems to be like srk music film.. Hehehe

Hmm i think i’m gonna give this movie 2,5 / 5. And the song 4/5 ;)

[Via http://piwid.wordpress.com]